,

Elcon Case Could See Courtroom By Spring, Solicitor Says


Elcon’s proposed site plan.
Credit: Tom Sofield/LevittownNow.com

Elcon’s appeal of the Falls Township Board of Supervisors’ unanimous 2019 decision to reject the firm’s land development plans for a proposed hazardous waste treatment facility could come before a Bucks County judge this year. 

At Monday’s Supervisors’ meeting, Falls Township Solicitor Michael Clarke said that at a December 20 hearing the court said Elcon has 30 days to submit a brief. After that, the township will have 30 days to submit their response, with Elcon getting another 10 days to file a rebuttal.

Advertisements


After the paper briefs are filed, the case could make its way before a judge and arguments would be made in open court.

Clarke said that he expects the oral arguments to take place in April or May. 

Following the township’s April 2019 rejection of the plan, Elcon filed an appeal in county court later that spring.

Advertisements


The appeal made the argument that Falls Township officials did not act in good faith and with a sound legal decision when denying the Israeli firm’s plan to construct their “state-of-the-art” facility on a 22-acre portion of a 33-acre property at 100 Dean Sievers Place in the Keystone Industrial Port Complex. According to past filings with the state, Elcon expects to employ about 55 people at the automated facility that can handle about 410 metric tons of waste a day. The facility has been expected to process 150,000 to 210,000 tons of chemical and pharmaceutical waste that would be transported to the facility via area roads every year.

“The township and the board breached their duty of good faith by, among other things, failing and refusing to openly and fairly discuss technical and ordnance requirements relating to the revised plans and failing to provide appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure any alleged defects relating to the proposed project after such discussion,” Elcon lawyers stated.

Advertisements


In their initial 40-page filing, Elcon said the denial of the application was “erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and contrary to law.”

Elcon still has their application before the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

Last month, the DEP requested several clarifications from Elcon concerning their proposed groundwater monitoring program.

Advertisements


Residents from around the region have voiced their concerned and turned out in force to object to Elcon’s plan.

Related:

Advertisements



 

Report a correction via email | Editorial standards and policies